Nkandla: Is It Just Zuma's Greed?

By Shawn Hattingh · 11 Apr 2014

A+ A= A-
    Print this page      2 comments
2
     
Picture: President Jacob Zuma courtesy GovernmentZA/flickr
Picture: President Jacob Zuma courtesy GovernmentZA/flickr

The Public Protector’s report on Nkandla has unleashed a storm of anger. Radio shows and newspaper columns have been filled with people complaining about the state spending vast sums on upgrading the President’s private residence. Rightfully, they have pointed out that it is wrong that the state spent R248 million on the project – money, which could have been spent on housing, healthcare and service delivery for the public.

However, when it comes to analysing how Nkandla could happen and what it represents, most of the analysis has been shallow. In fact, the analysis of why the Nkandla scandal happened and what it symbolises has often taken on racist undertones or has merely been put down to the personal greed of President Jacob Zuma. While Zuma has been mired in endless corruption scandals, Nkandla points to bigger problems beyond the character of the President or his propensity for corruption. In fact, it points towards problems associated with neoliberalism, class rule, and even how the state under capitalism is a site of accumulation for the ruling class

How Politicians Get Rich through the State

In society, the state plays a central role in protecting the interests of the ruling class. In capitalist societies this has seen states protecting and furthering the interests of elites. As such, state resources are often skewed disproportionately towards meeting the needs of the rich.

But the state can also be used as a site by an elite to accumulate wealth. In recent history this was evident in countries that were emerging from colonialism. In such countries, indigenous business people often did not exist - due to colonialism and the positioning of these countries in the international capitalist order - and for an emerging elite the state offered one of the few paths to accumulate wealth. As such, many Third World elites used newly independent states and their links to elites in the First World to amass private wealth - sometimes on a very large scale.

However, even in North America and Europe, being positioned high in the state offered and offers opportunities to amass wealth. Along with the perks that holding high office within the state brings – including large salaries – this has often also taken the form of corruption, including bribery by private capital. For example, in 1961 the West German Minister of Defence was paid a bribe of over R100 million in order to ensure that the West German state bought fighter jets from Lockheed. Thus class rule, states, capitalism and accumulating wealth have always gone hand in hand and have often involved outright corruption.

Accumulation through the State in South Africa

By the time apartheid fell, South Africa had developed a local capitalist class. However, due to apartheid, this class was almost exclusively white. Aspiring capitalists linked to the ANC, who wanted to own large private companies, were frustrated by these capitalists. In fact, ownership of large corporations still remains largely in the hands of white businesspersons.

This has meant that for an aspiring elite around the ANC, like in many other former colonial countries, the state has offered the most viable way to accumulate wealth. This is why an ANC-linked elite has used the state to open up business opportunities for themselves. The ANC and the state’s relations with businesspeople like the Guptas is an example of this. It is also why managers within state-owned companies have been rewarded huge salaries.

Meanwhile, there have been on-going scandals linked to this phenomenon of using the state to accumulate private wealth. One need only think back to the arms deal. Nkandla is a continuation of this and arises because the state is being used as a site of accumulation. Zuma’s lavish homestead is an outcome of and symbol of accumulation via the state. In fact, President Zuma is not alone in using the state to upgrade his own property. Recently the state spent millions refurbishing ministers’ houses. Tens of millions were also spent on the properties of former presidents Thabo Mbeki and Nelson Mandela.

But using the state to get rich goes beyond simply improving private houses. The upgrade of properties is simply part of a larger drive to make money out of the state and open business opportunities through it. In some ways this echoes how an Afrikaner elite used the state to accumulate wealth and business opportunities in the face of the dominance of white English-speaking capitalists under apartheid.  

Neo-liberalism Has Made Things Worse

Under neoliberalism, however, the practice of officials using the state to secure private wealth has become even worse. Privatisation and tendering via public-private partnerships offers state officials, their family members and people that are politically connected the opportunity to become extremely rich. Since South Africa embraced neoliberal policies, outright corruption associated with privatisation and tendering across the world has also grown – and like all countries ours has not been immune.

One need only think of the state tenders to build the World Cup stadiums. These were awarded to the largest construction companies in South Africa, like Murray and Roberts. It has become clear that such companies colluded with one another to inflate their prices and accumulate wealth fraudulently through this. Nkandla is another example. Zuma’s desire for a private palace is not the only reason behind Nkandla’s hefty price tag. Its construction also became expensive because contractors inflated their prices. The architect’s fees alone were R18.6 million.

Nkandla, therefore, arises out of and represents how the drive to maximise profits has intensified state corruption, and how both businesspeople and state officials are using the state as a site to accumulate private wealth.

People should, therefore, rightfully be angry about Nkandla. They should fight against this and other forms of corruption. But this fight should not get sidetracked into just the personal flaws of Zuma because it represents far more than this. It demonstrates how the ruling class uses the state, as a site of accumulation - and also that it is a systemic problem. To fight corruption we should be fighting the state as an instrument of the ruling class, and perhaps more importantly, we should be challenging the neo-liberal model of capitalism.

Hattingh is a Researcher and Educator for the International Labour Research Information Group (ILRIG) in South Africa.

Should you wish to republish this SACSIS article, please attribute the author and cite The South African Civil Society Information Service as its source.

All of SACSIS' originally produced articles, videos, podcasts and transcripts are licensed under a Creative Commons license. For more information about our Copyright Policy, please click here.

To receive an email notification when a new SACSIS article is published, please click here.

For regular and timely updates of new SACSIS articles, you can also follow us on Twitter @SACSIS_News and/or become a SACSIS fan on Facebook.

You can find this page online at http://sacsis.org.za/site/article/1972.

A+ A= A-
    Print this page      2 comments
2
     

Leave A Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by registered readers are published immediately. Why wait? Register now or log in!

Comments

Rory Verified user
11 Apr

Accummulation at Other Expense

I could not agree with the author more. The difficulty we are faced with is coming up with a system, which does not offer opportunities for particular groups to accumulate whilst excluding others.

Respond to this comment



Horst Peschkes
12 Apr

Lockheed Bribery WG Defence Minister

To the author Shawn Hattingh:
Your article is to the point - but please correct or specify your statement regarding the bribe allegedly accepted by the 1961 West German Minister of Defence.

See Lockheed Bribery Scandal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_affair and other sources:
"Former Lockheed lobbyist Ernest Hauser told Senate investigators that Minister of Defence Franz Josef Strauss and his party had received at least $10 million for West Germany's purchase of 900 F-104G Starfighters in 1961. The party and its leader denied the allegations, and Strauss filed a slander suit against Hauser. As the allegations were not corroborated, the issue was dropped."

Respond to this comment